> I heard that before, and although I do agree with the general 'who does > the work decides', I don't think it applies 100% here. k-c-d was not > informed or I don't recall a call on blogs like 'hey we decided to go for > git, please come now to discuss the git details', i don't recall blogs > explaining the setup either. Things that influence how we as KDE work need > to be communicated well and people can not always be simply told to shut up > because they don't do the work. If things influence big parts of KDE there > needs to be a widespread support for the idea.
I brought up that point before. http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg01000.html It was not really successful. To bring everyone on the same page here some links to old threads that started like this one: http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg00935.html http://www.mail-archive.com/kde-scm-interest@kde.org/msg00863.html Both are really big, bring up every point one could make And made no difference. Mike _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest