----- Original Message ----- > On Sunday 05 December 2010 10.30.51 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > > > An objection here, to do this with the rules will silently alter > > > history. > > > > i think that's the whole idea here. the entire kate history is > > already > > in a separate repo, so unless one'd want to be able to check out > > historically accurate revisions of kdelibs (which is a pipe dream > > anyway), there is no reason to duplicate it. > > Well this will transform the history so that kate never have been in > kdelibs > and that would be to lie, or atleast I think so, hence the delete kate > before > or after but not during. > > I'm of the oppiniion that we should use the conversion to fix issues > but > hide/rewrite the past.
Could not agree more. + I like 1 thing at a time. Transition will be difficult enough for some people, combining it with build system changes / layout changes is not a good idea. Best, -- Tom Albers _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest