On Saturday, June 25, 2011 21:40:31 Ingo Klöcker wrote: > On Saturday 25 June 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > > On Thursday 23 June 2011 14:13:01 Ian Monroe wrote: > > > I'm thinking we should have a KDE Git transition BoF. One thought > > > is that the Git BoF happen after the release team BoF so that they > > > can be given the opportunity to add stuff to our agenda. > > > > Do you have anything in mind for this BoF which wouldn't fit in the > > release- team BoF itself? > > I think the audience for both BoFs is very different. The Git transition > BoF appears to address projects which did not yet do the transition to > Git while the release team BoF appears to address people interested in > doing release work. (Or maybe I'm reading too much from the BoFs' > titles.)
I quite agree with Ingo, and I think we need to think about our release management in a focused way, not mix it with issues around the Git migration. As I see it, Git or not should be completely transparant for how our releases look like. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 _______________________________________________ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest