On 29 December 2012 00:47, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > El Divendres, 28 de desembre de 2012, a les 13:36:39, Jeremy Whiting va > escriure: > > I've also just pushed new repos to scratch/whiting using the latest rules > > and parentmaps. There is one issue that some of the tags aren't > annotated > > so are failing the hook to be pushed, but otherwise check them out and > see > > if anything is missing. I'll look into the tag issue. > > CMake Error: The source directory "kde-dev-utils" does not appear to > contain > CMakeLists.txt. > This is because there is none. This repo is entirely new in its collection of utils, so we don't have a CMakeLists.txt. I would therefore argue to add one after the conversion.
> > strigi-analyzers seems a weak name, it ought to be something like > kdesdk-string-analyzers, since the repo name will be kde:xxx and you don't > want to "own" kde:strigi-analyzers > > Same for thumbnailers > I just adapted the rules to use the names kdesdk-strigi-analyzers and kdesdk-thumbnailers. > > the umbrello repo is huge, anything we could do so it's not that big? > > sandsmark in git says "git gc --aggressive && git prune gets it down to > 28mb > for me" maybe we can do that to all the repos? > As we usually did that in previous conversions, I agree we should do it here. > > Cheers, > Albert > > > > > thanks, > > Jeremy > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Sebastian Dörner < > > > > sebast...@sebastian-doerner.de> wrote: > > > I've been working with Jeremy (and Nicolas) so we can finally get this > > > over with. This is a heads-up about the strigi-analyzers. The current > > > situation is as follows: > > > > > > 1) Nobody seems to have very strong opinions about whether to have the > > > analyzers with the apps or their own repo (among the stakeholders Nick, > > > Kevin, Friedrich, Jeremy, me) > > > 2) Nick prefers the analyzers separate, because the analyzers don't > > > depend on lokalize. > > > 3) Kevin is unsure, would like to be consistent with whatever Lokalize > > > does. > > > 4) KDE / Nepomuk will probably move away from strigi in the future. > > > 5) Currently distributions often have a separate package > > > kdesdk-strigi-analyzers (or similar). > > > 6) It is easiest from a rule-writing pov to keep the analyzers > separate. > > > > > > Particularly because of points 4 and 5 we are currently implementing a > > > solution with separate repos for strigi-analyzers (all of them) and > > > thumbnailers. Neither the kompare nor the lokalize repo would then > contain > > > any strigi-analyzers. > > > If you have any objections, please bring them forward now. > > > > > > Regards > > > Sebastian > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Kde-scm-interest mailing list > > > kde-scm-inter...@kde.org > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest >
_______________________________________________ kde-sdk-devel mailing list kde-sdk-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-sdk-devel