> > The general direction (at least those parts of it I understand ;) ) > absolutely makes sense to me. > As for the timeline: It makes sense to me to get the kpeople2 version out > soon, but since I care a lot about "version numbering psychology", I'm not > sure if we should call it 0.8. Up to know, new 0.X releases of KTp usually > contained at least some new user-visible features. > Though the kpeople2 merge is a big deal from the technical side, for users > it will mostly mean fixed problems (not that this isn't important!) rather > than new features, right? > Therefore I'm thinking that maybe it should be called 0.7.5 or something, as > in "The features of 0.7, but now they work much better".
>From a feature and marketing point of view, yes I would agree with you. For a "not being murdered by packagers" point of view we have to bump the major version to change dependencies. > Cheers, > Thomas > _______________________________________________ > KDE-Telepathy mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy _______________________________________________ KDE-Telepathy mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-telepathy
