Any reason for not using the a stable build officially? https://binary-factory.kde.org/job/Kate_Release_win64/
On 16/08/2018 10:43, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann wrote: > Hi Hannah, > > thanks for the quick response. > > I will then just link the nighties as additional downloads and keep the > additional links to the build Kåre picks. > > I hope that makes the nice binary-factory builds more discoverable. > > Will do the same for macOS, the last nightlies already work better than my old > crap. > > Greetings > Christoph > > ----- Am 16. Aug 2018 um 8:25 schrieb Hannah von Reth vonr...@kde.org: > >> Hi Christoph, >> >> The idea is that binary-factory offers daily stable and unstable build, >> using always the latest libraries provided by Craft. >> >> Pointing people to the unstable job for nighties is a ok. >> >> For releases the idea was that a team tests a specific installer, if >> everything works ok the >> team then follows the usual release process for downloads-kde. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Hannah >> >> On 15/08/2018 22:36, Dr.-Ing. Christoph Cullmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> if we e.g. want to link to the lastest produced binary packages >>> from the binary factory for Kate (nightly and release), what is the right >>> way to do that? >>> >>> Is there some download.kde.org place were the last sucessfull builds are >>> kept >>> some days for public consumption? I assume one should not link the latest >>> successful >>> build pages like >>> >>> https://binary-factory.kde.org/view/Windows%2064-bit/job/Kate_Release_win64/ >>> >>> to the user, or? >>> >>> Greetings >>> Christoph
