On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 11:34:40AM +0100, Evert Vorster wrote: > I would keep the other two stabilizers around for a while, there is no harm > in having a choice, is there?
I keep seeing too many people think this way, and yes indeed, there is harm in having a choice. It is not a meaningful choice to users; how would they know which one to choose? And it means more code to be maintained, more clutter in the UI, and more confusion. The user does not want three different video stabilization filter, he/she just wants one that works. I would love if free software would be better at realizing that choice fundamentally tends to make people unhappy. The only real argument for keeping them that I can see would be that we shouldn't break existing projects without a good reason, but Dan has already pointed out that removing them won't. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM Community Edition Quickly connect people, data, and systems into organized workflows Winner of BOSSIE, CODIE, OW2 and Gartner awards http://p.sf.net/sfu/Bonitasoft _______________________________________________ Kdenlive-devel mailing list Kdenlive-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
