On Tuesday 20 May 2003 16:15, Reinhard Amersberger wrote: > kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 20.05.03 13:33:20: > You are right, the graphical presentation is not very good and could be > done like in your picture, but the benefit is (IMHO) that there is no need > do drag some kind of transition items to the timeline .... just move one of > the upper corners of one of the involved clips to create a transition.
Ok, I understand. So basicly what you and Jason are suggesting is, that whereever two clips in (adjacent?) tracks are overlapping in time, a default transition is automatically created. The transition type can be changed afterwards in the transition dialog. Right? Sounds pretty good. (If I got it right) > > > greetings > Reinhard > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel -- Cheers, Rolf *************************************************************** Rolf Dubitzky http://hep.phy.tu-dresden.de/~dubitzky e-mail: Rolf.Dubitzky at Physik dot TU-Dresden dot de ***************************************************************