On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 11:20:47PM +0100, jb wrote: > Or do you think I should push to svn and the git migration > happens after that?
Sorry for bikeshedding but relying on repository migration for rolling out important bugfixes is not what I'd usually do: if some additional glitches occur, the fixes might get delayed, and even if not, some folks will be slow to realize the change of location (this can be helped: http://tinyurl.com/cygadyb). > #2373 Loading project from a few days ago, leaves Project Tree > unresponsive / unusable > #2385 Timeline shows wrong time in certain cases > #2363 Crash when trying to save project as a new file using "save as" > #2381 Kdenlive Crashes on start up Yikes! On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 03:17:04AM -0600, Evert Vorster wrote: > > To my opinion 0.8.2.1 would be more appropriate to state that > > 0.8.2 is not perfectly stable, and needs an upgrade > Changing the number of numbers in the release is a pain to > handle in automated scripts for distrobution maintainers. If the scripts are that sloppy it's the wrong way to fix it upstream (I maintain a few hundred packages in ALT Linux). Even if that's a problem, there's a practice of putting up "a" releases, like 0.8.2a to hint that 0.8.2 was flaky. But someone's -0\.[0-9]\.[0-9]\. will choke either. :) -- ---- WBR, Michael Shigorin <mike at altlinux.ru> ------ Linux.Kiev http://www.linux.kiev.ua/