Suggestions:
* Let's go through all reports until Dec 31, 2010 (to have a clear boundary).
* Comment on each report, even it is still valid, so that we do not do
duplicate work
* Start with the oldest ones ;) Nearly 80 % of all reports are from 2009.

2010/4/1 Hugh Tebby <hugh.tebby at gmail.com>:
> I'll probably have a go at cleaning up next week-end, maybe even during the
> week if I have a bit of time in the evenings.
>
> First objective : get the bug count down by 100 !
>
>
> 2010/4/1 Simon Eugster <simon.eu at gmail.com>
>>
>> 2010/4/1 Albert ARIBAUD <albert.aribaud at free.fr>:
>> > To speed things up, I can already tell bug 436 is still relevant. :)
>>
>> Yeah, that's gonna speed up the process a lot :)
>>
>> I agree that a cleanup is necessary.
>> Perhaps I might even have time to help next week.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
>> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
>


Reply via email to