JMP, interesting opinion, but note that you are looking at performance enhancing instead of features.
"Professionals" would probably much rather have a normal color grader, non-crashing while moving video, a LOT of tiny details that other aplications perfected during the years, not to mention TGA (yes, pictures) or advanced exports instead of faster compositing. The places i know to be "pro" usualy have rendering farms and such and dont really care that much about speed on a single computer. Also for example if you run Eyeon Fusion software and notice its export formats list... its almost as big as the ffmpeg codec list:) I was actually hoping to get some comment from the people that know the kdenlive internals better what are the posibilties of: - in gui clip replacing - tga export - goodness, maybe even a series of TGA images treated as video. Belive me, THAT would open a couple of doors. Exporting to TGA, even batch processing in the gimp if else fails, and reimporting is VERY powerful. Feedback appriciated. BR, Slavko p.s. the AAF seems a bit dated, legacy filled and committee ridden. 2009/6/24 Jean-Michel Pour? <jm at poure.com> > On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 19:18 -0300, Oceanwatcher wrote: > > Have to check. Want me to do it for you? > > Dear Oceanwater, > > IMHO, a huge step forward would be to study nvidia VDPAU in details to > see howto to interface with the card and receive decoded frames within > FFmpeg. It would open the doors of professional video makers and > advanced users. This is just my opinion. > > Kind regards, > Jean-Michel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20090624/5af51637/attachment.html>