ok guys I understand your point of view, so what if there could be some "chapter-marker-functionallity" in kdenlive to be imported by qdvdauthor (when opening a kdenlive project in qdvdauthor)? Wouldn't this be helpful?
greetings Reinhard kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 19.02.04 12:36:09: > > I agree with Jason, > > there is a certain goal that you set yourself. And following the UNIX > tradition, to build simple tools (if you can speak of simple in this > regard) which is very flexible and powerfull and can be combined easily > with other tools. > > I think it is somewhat comparable with KOffice vs the gnome office > suite. It is nice to that all application have the same look and feel > and interopperate with each other. But each application is and can be > used independand of each other. So is kdenlive and QDVDAuthor. You can > use both seperately and have two powerfull tools (I hope) or you can > cludge all into one GUI (style) only to have ALL functions possibly ever > needed. Think about the 80% of MSOffice functionality which no normal > person will ever touch. > > But hey maybe we can bundle both apps and ask for 29,- pounds ;o) > > Of course, where it makes sense to put functions i one or the other > application we'll do so. > > And just as Jason said I am more then willing to help any one out who > wants to create a combined application based on the current available > code. The more variety, the better IMHO. > > Cheers ... > > Varol Okan :) > > Jason Wood wrote: > > >On Wednesday 18 February 2004 05:03, Reinhard Amersberger wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>just a comment .... > >> > >>it would be cool if you guys would join your projects to create a similar > >>functionallity like this tool I saw by a friend which seems to become (is) > >>very popular in windows world, because it helps the user to finish hisng > >>project from capturing to the final movie (also burning a dvd). Please have > >>a look here: > >>http://site.magix.net/index.php?4625&version=deluxe > >> > >> > > > >I have seen a number of similar applications, and they are indeed popular > >(or > >becoming popular). The only real issue is that in my mind, Kdenlive is > >aiming > >towards the Premier/Final Cut Pro/Avid end of video editing as opposed to > >the > >Windows Movie Creator end of video editing. i.e., it is aiming for the > >semi-professional/professional end of editing more than the home user - > >Hence > >the (admittedly long-term) plans for project management, etc. > > > >This is not because of the infrastructure, but because of a conscious > >decision > >as to what the UI is aiming to achieve. It would be quite possible to write > >a > >simpler "cut down" version of the Kdenlive interface in much less time than > >it has taken to get what we have so far (because we could re-use a lot of > >the > >code that is already written, and piave would not need to be touched in the > >slightest). > > > >I'll get onto it when I finish Kdenlive 1.0 ;-) but if anyone is interested > >in > >trying in the meantime, let me know and we can organize the best way to do > >it > >without duplicatig code. > > > >Cheers, > >Jason > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Kdenlive-devel mailing list > Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel