hi evert, 2017-08-03 7:16 GMT-03:00 Evert Vorster <evors...@gmail.com>:
> Hi there, JBM. > I am in the process of making the kdenlive-testing-git package for Arch > Linux. > It will be tracking the refactoring_timeline branch for now, as that seems > to be the branch with the most action. > this is the refactoring branch: https://cgit.kde.org/kdenlive.git/log/?h=refactoring_timeline > It's a pain to rename/remove packages in Arch Linux, so I do not want to > make a package for each branch. > > Currently I am maintaining: > kdenlive-git, tracking master > kdenlive-release-git, tracking the latest release > and now kdenlive-testing-git, which will track whichever branch you would > like a wider audience to test. > i am a heavy user of kdenlive-git from aur, thanks :D maybe you could install the refactoring branch in /opt and have the provides parameter in the pkgbuild use something like kdenlive-refactor, that way we'll be able to test it without removing the main version. > Please confirm that refactoring_timeline is the branch that you would like > to have testing performed on. > happy to test your package whenever it is ready. > > Kind regards, > Evert > also On 3 August 2017 at 11:00, Evert Vorster <evors...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi therem JBM. >> >> I can make a Arch Linux package for the refactoring branch, now that it >> is nearly usable. >> The only drawback with making these packages is that they replace the >> system package, so I have to wait until the branch is mostly usable. >> >> kdenlive-testing-git would be the name of the package. >> >> Kind regards, >> Evert Vorster >> >> On 3 August 2017 at 07:31, Jean-Baptiste Mardelle <j...@kdenlive.org> >> wrote: >> >>> On 01.08.2017 08:36, Evert Vorster wrote: >>> >>>> Hi there... >>>> >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>>> The timeline refactoring was widely touted as a fix for many bugs, and I >>>> have been waiting patiently for the refactoring to be comleted. >>>> >>> Thanks for the patience :) We are also very excited to have a usable >>> preview release soon. Scarlett is still working on the AppImage CI that >>> should hopefully be ready by the end of august (maybe for next cafe) - >>> otherwise we will look for other solutions to provide testing, because >>> currently there is no other way to try it than compile it manually. >>> >>>> It would only make sense to try and recreate the bugs already open >>>> against >>>> kdenlive in the timeline-refactored version. >>>> One immediate benefit would be that the list of open bugs against >>>> Kdenlive >>>> shrinks, and we identify where the real problems remain. >>>> >>> that is the idea actually, those 3 i posted are on the tracker, if you know of other specific corruption issues post them here as well... we should eventually have a bug squash for this. cheers :D > >>> I will try to update the Phabricator status page regarding our >>> refactoring progress, but currently the basic timeline operations (move, >>> delete, group/ungroup) and tools work (razor, spacer), as does undo. >>> Effects / compositions are almost finished and mostly working (effect >>> group not yet fully exposed). Clip markers, guides and proxy clips are also >>> working. >>> >>> What remains to be done is: >>> * effect compare >>> * timeline preview >>> * speed effect (this requires some special tricks in timeline) >>> >>> Then we can start work on advanced trimming, and other exciting stuff. >>> >>> So whenever we can provide a reliable way to test, the first steps would >>> be as you suggested to test the timeline stability with move/cut/group/undo >>> operations. >>> >>> Best regards and see you soon in next café (21st of august)! >>> >>> Jean-Baptiste >>> >>> >>> >>> Kind regards, >>>> Evert Vorster >>>> >>>> On 1 August 2017 at 07:20, Harald Albrecht <harald.albre...@gmx.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As for #3, my experience with stable/master is that you should click, >>>>> drag, wait but don't release, then drag further, wait, drag, ..., >>>>> release. >>>>> Often, the intermittent stops without releasing the mouse button are >>>>> where >>>>> the corruption creeps in. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Harald >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -------- >>>>> Von: farid abdelnour <snd.no...@gmail.com> >>>>> Datum: 01.08.17 01:13 (GMT+01:00) >>>>> An: kdenlive <kdenlive@kde.org> >>>>> Betreff: timeline corruptions >>>>> >>>>> hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> some tests we can do to see if the timeline corruptions happen when >>>>> testing the refactoring branch are these: >>>>> >>>>> 1- speed effect >>>>> 2- undo/redo various times after moving clips and restart project >>>>> 3- move many clips at the same time through the timeline >>>>> >>>>> do you know/suspect of any other? write them here so we can thoroughly >>>>> test this. >>>>> >>>>> jb and alcinos, is this something helpful to do? >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> 1111.1010.r.i.1101|n.o.i.s.1110|i.m.1010.g.1110|مقاومة >>>>> fsf member #5439 >>>>> usuario GNU/Linux #471966 >>>>> |_|0|_| >>>>> |_|_|0| >>>>> |0|0|0| >>>>> <a href="http://www.gunga.com.br">gunga</a> >>>>> <a href="http://www.tempoecoarte.com.br">tempoecoarte</a> >>>>> <a href="http://www.atelier-labs.org">atelier-labs</a> >>>>> <a href="http://www.mocambos.net">rede mocambos</a> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Evert Vorster >> Isometrix Acquistion Superchief >> >> > > > -- > Evert Vorster > Isometrix Acquistion Superchief > > -- 1111.1010.r.i.1101|n.o.i.s.1110|i.m.1010.g.1110|مقاومة fsf member #5439 usuario GNU/Linux #471966 |_|0|_| |_|_|0| |0|0|0| <a href="http://www.gunga.com.br">gunga</a> <a href="http://www.tempoecoarte.com.br">tempoecoarte</a> <a href="http://www.atelier-labs.org">atelier-labs</a> <a href="http://www.mocambos.net">rede mocambos</a>