Ciao Massimo, 2017-08-30 11:02 GMT-03:00 Massimo Stella <maxs...@tin.it>:
> Hi everybody. > I don't think we have to be too rigid in any choice we do and it's not the > matter to be a clone or not of other software. > Generally, applications are similar only for the facts that they try to > use the best possible approach to make users happy when they are using the > specific application. > So, for me, the question is: which is the best possible approach for > making Kdenlive the fastest and the easier software around? > How can Kdenlive do a certain feature solve my problems in arranging > complicated sequence on the timeline? > The question for me is not how to make Kdenlive different but how to make > Kdenlive the best in term of approach to the editing work. > What I like about the current way to proceed is the fact that you can turn > any clip in Audio/Video or just video or just audio (and this is very > useful for recovering sync) > What I dislike about the mixed approach is that when you have to produce > the final audio (I'm thinking about a professional project where the > timeline is always very complex) you have to rearrange all the clips in a > reasonable way, so you have to check where every single chunk of audio is. > Then, I want to see the mixer of an animation project with 10 video tracks > and 5 audio tracks: you'll find a 15 tracks mixer with 10 empty tracks. > So if we make it in a way that whenever there is a video track without audio then it wouldn't appear in the mixer, would that "fix" the issue? > I guess that instead of being ideologically oriented (be different, be > unique, etc) we have to find pro and cons of all the approaches and find > the best possible solution to make Kdenlive not just different but better. > +1 Massimo > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: evors...@gmail.com > Data: 30-ago-2017 8.26 > A: "j...@dodin.org"<j...@dodin.org> > Cc: "Kdenlive"<kdenlive@kde.org> > Ogg: Re: question: mixed vc separate clips > > Hi there, everybody. > > As a Kdenlive user, I think the opinions of Kdenlive users matter more > than the opinion of the developers of other video editing software. > > It's only logical, surely there must be a reason that Kdenlive is the > preferred editor for the users that are using it? > > You might be much better served with a survey to the kdenlive users on > this mailing list. I, for one, do not want Kdenlive to turn into a clone of > the other editors. > > Kind regards, > -Evert Vorster- > > On 30 August 2017 at 06:43, j...@dodin.org <j...@dodin.org> wrote: > >> Le 30/08/2017 à 01:34, alcinos a écrit : >> >> If you want to voice an opinion for one of the approaches, or outline >>> advantages/drawbacks that we may not have thought of, we are looking >>> forward to hearing from you!" >>> >> >> of course (?) the two clips created from the bin must have some sort of >> link to keep video and audio in sync. >> >> It's already not that easy to keep videos in sync when using the >> automatic audio sync between several tracks (which is one of the kdenlive >> strength). >> >> thanks >> jdd >> -- >> http://dodin.org >> > > > > -- > Evert Vorster > Isometrix Acquistion Superchief > > > > -- 1111.1010.r.i.1101|n.o.i.s.1110|i.m.1010.g.1110|مقاومة fsf member #5439 usuario GNU/Linux #471966 |_|0|_| |_|_|0| |0|0|0| <a href="http://www.gunga.com.br">gunga</a> <a href="http://www.tempoecoarte.com.br">tempoecoarte</a> <a href="http://www.atelier-labs.org">atelier-labs</a> <a href="http://www.mocambos.net">rede mocambos</a>