Hello There are many people reading the list, just not having much to say. Also, august is a break/restart period for several of us, occupied to other things. I agree the frame number is a more precise indicator than milliseconds, or I would like arguments if the change was intentional. We just need someone available to do the change... BR, Vincent
Le 29 août 2021 07:06:52 GMT+02:00, "amin...@mailbox.org" <amin...@mailbox.org> a écrit : >I can't tell - does radio silence mean there's no way to do this, or simply >that nobody's responding (and maybe not many are reading)? > >On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:59:34AM +0200, Narcis Garcia wrote: >> +1 >> >> El 19/8/21 a les 0:53, amin...@mailbox.org ha escrit: >> > Newer versions of Kdenlive (in my case 20.12.3) seem to specify in and out >> > points as timestamps in the project files instead of frame numbers. For >> > example, the 7th frame in a 24fps clip will be referenced as >> > "00:00:00.292" (which is rounded) whereas earlier versions of Kdenlive >> > would have just said "7". >> > >> > I much prefer the old behavior; is there a setting to switch back to it? >> > I've looked but am very much hoping I'm just not looking in the right >> > place. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Tom >> > >> >> -- >> >> >> __________ >> I'm using this express-made address because personal addresses aren't >> masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator >> should fix this against automated addresses collectors. -- Envoyé de mon appareil Android avec Courriel K-9 Mail. Veuillez excuser ma brièveté.
