https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86423
--- Comment #113 from Tomas <nicco ts gmail com> 2009-12-08 20:47:15 --- Hey Thomas We all appreciate all your work for Kmail. I have just one problem with your priorities. Who has required porting Kmail to Akonadi? How much votes do you have for this and why is this higher priority than HTML support? It looks like you are building skyscraper on 5th avenue but people in Bronx still don't have roof on their houses. (In reply to comment #110) > I said I didn't want to reply to this again, but oh well, I have to clarify > something. > > I'd like to address comment 108, in which the author says things like "subtle > ideological resistance", "decision-makers [..] may even consider one of their > own, who finally implements it, to be a \"sell-out\"" and "it is viewed as > DETRIMENTAL". > > This is simply not true. As I've said before in comment 64: I'd like better > HTML support in KMail. In fact, I have worked on some minor stuff like inline > images for HTML myself. I don't know any developer who is opposed to better > HTML support. > > I know I'm repeating myself: We consider better HTML support good. The only > reason it is not implemented is that I had no time to do that myself, so far, > and no one else came up with a complete patch yet. > > Right now, I'm most busy with the Akonadi port of KMail, which does indeed > have > greater priority, there is a _lot_ to do to make KMail work properly with > Akonadi. > > That said, the plan in the back of my head was always to refactor the template > parser and then add HTML support to it. Maybe I can come to this during the > Akonadi port at some point. Money certainly helps shifting the priorities :) > But don't get your hopes up, it mainly depends on available time. > > Also, the composer wouldn't use the WebKit editor, that is too much work. > Instead if would use QTextEdit, which means same HTML format preserving as > Mailody has, nothing fancy. Porting the whole composer to a WebKit editor > would > really be much work. > > At this point, KMail is feature-frozen, so any new feature has to be developed > in the Akonadi ports branch. KMail 2 (based on Akonadi) is expected/hoped to > be > released with KDE 4.5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Kdepim-bugs mailing list Kdepim-bugs@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
