https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216806
Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reinh...@kainhofer.com
--- Comment #4 from Reinhold Kainhofer <reinhold kainhofer com> 2010-01-13
15:04:12 ---
AFAICS, the RFCs (2445 and 5545) do not specify how exactly completion should
be indicated...
My comment on IRC:
[14:39] <reinhold> hyper_ch: Regarding your STATUS:COMPLETED vs.
PERCENT-COMPLETE:100, the rfcs 2445 and 5545 (the successor to RFC
2445) do not require STATUS:COMPLETED to be set. Actually, it does not
specify at all how completion should be indicated. There are three
completion settings: STATUS:COMPLETED, COMPLETED:Date-Time,
PERCENT-COMPLETE:100
[14:41] <reinhold> hyper_ch: Actually, the example at the end of
section 3.6.2 shows a completed todo with STATUS:NEEDS-ACTION... See
http://pastebin.org/75500
[14:41] <reinhold> hyper_ch: That might be an oversight, though.
I've now also sent a request for clarification to the calsify mailing list:
http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/ietf-calsify/2010-January/002234.html
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
