https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307807

--- Comment #4 from Anders Lund <and...@alweb.dk> ---
Of course it is very good to ensure that the right nepomuk code is used.

But it is equally importnat that ALL aspects of this area is optimized. For
example there is a patch waiting that should prevent reindexing when flags are
changed. 

On my system, my owncloud resources are often dropped, and judging from the
virtuoso-t activity when they are rediscovered, they are also reindexed again.
Quite absurd, for my calendars  + contacts! Let me know if I can help
investigate or if my log files can help!

What happens with new mail? Receiving a few mails costs minutes of virtuoso-t
activity > 30-50% CPU here, and that can not be reasonable, even given
virtuoso-t or nepomuk inefficiency - indexing many times the amount of images
or documents is barely visible. So I can't help wondering if messages are
indexed more than once, for example when moved by a filter. If that is the
case, there is a low-hanging fruit to pick!

Mail that is set as spam by my bogofilter should NEVER be indexed, so can trust
that mail in trash folders are never indexed right? But that is not enough, as
long as filtering is not always trustworthy itself, often spam messages are
left in the inbox, and it is still silly to index it. Is there a header I can
add to prevent that from happening? (and that the spam filtering wizard could
add to the filters it creates!)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs

Reply via email to