https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326476
staka...@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |staka...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 from staka...@freenet.de ---
Well, let's fight for this, since I frustratingly try to convince the very few!
reliable friends I have to consistently propagate the use of GPG, maybe that
can help. Why not. Worth a try. P.S. thank you for the link about crypto for
all. Nice.
Reasons to vote for this:
a) people really do not understand the importance of encrypting even now
b) people begin to associate through FUD the gpg as something "only agents
should do" and as something forbidden, "exposing them".
c) people do not understand the advantages of the use of consistent gpg
encryption, regarding personalized spam and social engineered phishing (what do
you engeneer if you do not know what they are writing, right?)
d) people are not aware of the little pitfalls on privacy (like the header and
the subject NOT being encrypted).
So such a tutorial and promotion could address all that with few, well done
unified info that is (especially important) consistent through different
distributions.
I will vote for this thing with a few points but I think you should consider to
"fusion" this proposal with 318005, as redundancy shall disperse the other
users votes (a bit as happens here with me).
YMMV of course.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Kdepim-bugs mailing list
Kdepim-bugs@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdepim-bugs
