Send kea-dev mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kea-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: thoughts on #3780 (Stephen Morris)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 15:28:00 +0100
From: Stephen Morris <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [kea-dev] thoughts on #3780
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
> On 10/23/15 9:15 AM, Stephen Morris wrote:
>> On 22/10/2015 16:49, Thomas Markwalder wrote:
>
>> A possible alternative to calling exit() is to replace all "catch (...)"
>> clauses with:
>>
>> catch (const isc::FatalException&) {
>> throw;
>> }
>> catch (...) {
>> :
>> }
> Actually it isn't just "catch (...)", we have to look at
> catch(std::exception)
> and/or catch(isc::Exception). The latter depending upon the class from
> which
> a new FatalException is derived.
If FatalException is derived from neither std::exception nor
isc::Exception, we won't have to worry about those catch clauses.
Stephen
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
kea-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-dev
End of kea-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11
***************************************
