My concern is simple: it is not in the standard and it defeats the common code which scans interfaces to get all the addresses a network server may individually bind to. Now to be frank IMHO a feature which allows to bind to any address is basically a bit dangerous...
Now if you still think that UCARP is a good way to provide redundant DHCP service I propose to mark these addresses as virtual and of course we'll need the way to allow them on all supported (and unsupported when the feature exists) systems (BTW what is it for macOS? Officially UCARP is supported on it). Same for VRRP. Thanks Francis Dupont <fdup...@isc.org> _______________________________________________ Kea-users mailing list Kea-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/kea-users
