On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India allowed non-banking financial companies 
(NBFCs) to raise funds by issuing perpetual debt instruments that can be 
included in their Tier-I capital. But market players and analysts feel this is 
unlikely to help NBFCs' brimming cup of woes. "Who will give them perpetual 
debt now?" asked Axis Bank economist Saugata Bhattacharya. 

Consider. The bonds that many NBFCs have bought of real estate companies and 
SMEs have become illiquid. Not only are banks and mutual funds unwilling to 
provide funds to NBFCs, these institutions are also finding it difficult to 
rollover their commercial papers or to issue fresh papers. Barring a handful of 
large NBFCs that can get support from their parent companies, most companies 
are facing liquidity crunch, industry sources say. 

"The business model of NBFCs has been that they buy bonds of real estate 
companies and SMEs on pretty high interest rates. By itself, it's not a bad 
model except when there is a 'liquidity crunch,'" says JP Morgan chief 
economist for India, Jahangir Aziz. 

RBI has asked for data from NBFCs about their exposure to the real estate and 
SME sectors, a senior official at a foreign NBFC said. Industry executives say 
that defaults are on the rise as realty and SMEs are unable to repay their 
debts. 

Another key source of funding for NBFCs - fixed maturity plans or FMPs sold by 
the mutual funds industry-is under Sebi scrutiny. For some schemes, the NBFC 
exposure is as high as 90% through a variety of issuances. The stock market 
regulator is taking stock of the asset-liability mismatches and concentration 
of investments. Sebi officials indicate that reporting norms would be tweaked 
soon and investment norms rationalised. This would mean funds will have to pare 
their exposure to NBFCs, aggravating their cash crunch. 

Sources confirmed that in some cases, the parent company has bought the bond 
papers of the NBFCs to provide them immediate liquidity. And the firms that 
have little cash to lend are asking for substantial collateral. Indeed, a 
Delhi-based NBFC, an arm of a large brokerage firm, has recently loaned about 
Rs 800 crore to a leading real estate company at 24% interest rate after 
obtaining almost four times collaterals, a source said. 

A rapid slide in stock prices also means that NBFCs would find it tough to 
recover their dues. What also make NBFCs risky is that their funding is mostly 
short term while their assets are long term. This means funds become scarce 
when a sudden redemption pressure arrives and the investment holdings become 
illiquid. 

Many NBFCs have asked the government for liquidity support and officials say 
the government is considering tweaking the prudential norms for NBFCs. This 
could mean banks may be allowed to have a larger exposure to NBFC bonds. 
Currently, a bank cannot lend more than 10% of its capital funds to a single 
NBFC. This cap stands at 15% for asset financing NBFC. But market players feel 
that even if the guidelines are eased, banks may not be forthcoming to invest. 
"Everybody is hoarding liquidity now," a banker said, adding that the risk 
averseness to lend is making the life of NBFCs tough. 

The current crisis has also raised a larger policy debate on regulations of 
NBFCs. "Banks and NBFCs perform largely the same function but norms governing 
them are different. There is now a call for making the regulation 
institution-independent," said Rajesh Chakrabarti, assistant professor, 
finance, Indian School of Business. Arguing for a level-playing field in 
regulatory treatment, the Raghuram Rajan panel on financial sector reforms had 
stressed that "the more an NBFC approaches the characteristics of a bank by 
issuing short-term deposits, the greater should be the similarity in 
treatment." 

Although NBFCs account for a mere 2% of the Indian credit market, as per RBI 
data, their potential to damage other financial institutions makes them 
systemically vulnerable. A non-deposit taking NBFC with an asset size of at 
least Rs 100 crore is considered as a systemically important entity, and is 
required to maintain a capital adequacy of 10%.

http://www.financialexpress.com/news/no-relief-in-sight-for-nbfcs/379580/
Rich get experience. Experienced get rich.







--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to