Simbhaoli, Modi Sugar start cane crushing 



      Break ranks with other cos as deadlock over cane pricing continues.  








 
A file picture of sugarcane being taken for crushing. 

Harish Damodaran 


New Delhi, Nov. 9 Even as the deadlock with the State Government over cane 
pricing continues, a couple of sugar mills in Uttar Pradesh have started 
crushing operations for the current 2008-09 season (October-September).

Factories in Uttar Pradesh were till now refraining from taking up crushing for 
the new season, following a dispute over the State Government fixing 
('advising') a price of Rs 140 a quintal for normal cane and Rs 145 a quintal 
for early maturing varieties. The State Advised Price (SAP) for 2007-08 was set 
at a lower Rs 125-130 range.

The industry had filed a writ petition against the new SAP at the Allahabad 
High Court. The latter, on Thursday, refused to grant any interim relief to the 
mills. Instead, it asked the State Government to file a counter affidavit, 
while fixing November 18 as the date for the matter to be heard.

But in the meantime, two mills - Mr U.K. Modi's Modi Sugar Mills and Simbhaoli 
Sugars Ltd (SSL) of Mr G.S. Mann - have broken ranks and begun crushing. Modi 
Sugar's unit at Modi Nagar (Ghaziabad) commenced operations on Wednesday, with 
SSL following suit at its Brijnathpur and Simbhaoli factories towards the 
week-end. 

"SSL was left with little option, given the proximity of both mills to the Modi 
Nagar plant in the same district," sources told Business Line. 

Interim arrangement 


Under the purchase system followed in Uttar Pradesh, growers supply cane to 
mills against indents specifying a predetermined delivery schedule. For every 
batch of cane they bring, the mills issue a parchi mentioning the net weight 
and price payable for that quantity.

This time round, the mills that have started crushing have reportedly left the 
price payable portion in the parchis blank, while stamping 'subject to court 
orders' on top of it. "There has been an informal agreement with the growers 
that if the High Court prescribes a particular price on November 18, they would 
be paid that rate. But suppose that does not happen and the case goes to the 
Supreme Court, the growers would straightaway be given last year's SAP of Rs 
125-130 till the matter gets decided," the sources said.

The growers were apparently satisfied with the interim arrangement, as it would 
enable them to vacate their cane area well in time to plant wheat. Moreover, 
although the Uttar Pradesh Government had fixed the cane price for 2007-08 at 
Rs 125-130 a quintal, the growers actually received only Rs 110 as an interim 
rate fixed by the Supreme Court pending a final decision on the mills' petition 
against the previous year's SAP.

"The industry's hope is that the high court will grant an interim relief 
against the SAP for 2008-09 too, failing which they can again approach the 
Supreme Court. But that entails waiting till almost the month-end," sources 
pointed out, adding that it was 'unrealistic' to expect the courts to fix the 
same Rs 110 interim price for the current season as well when sugar prices have 
clearly firmed up.




"One has to be practical and take the farmers along because otherwise they will 
simply not plant cane next time. One cannot delay crushing beyond a point," 
they noted. According to them, many more mills will commence operations once 
the auspicious 'Ganga Snan' (holy dip) period ends on November 13.

http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/11/10/stories/2008111051650100.htm

 "Some cause happiness wherever they go; others whenever they go."
 - Oscar Wilde 








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

<<inline: 2008111051650101.jpg>>

Reply via email to