Shishir Bhate on board the PM's aircraft

Stating that the International Monetary Fund had failed in its role to provide 
early warning of any impending financial disaster, Finance Minister P 
Chidambaram said on Thursday that there was a pressing need to have an 
effective global surveillance mechanism to avoid such future shocks.

The finance minister was speaking to the media aboard the Prime Minister's 
special aircraft on way to Washington to attend the G20 Summit.

Reiterating Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's views, the finance minister said 
that India's views at the G20 Summit will mainly focus on three issues:
  a.. There is a need for greater inclusivity in the international financial 
system 
  b.. There the need to ensure that the growth prospects of the developing 
countries do not suffer, and 
  c.. There is a need to avoid protectionist tendencies.
"The key point is, we must agree to a new order of global oversight. And this 
can come only by, as the prime minister said, greater inclusivity in the 
international financial system.

"In many ways, the IMF (inclusivity) and the G-7 is too narrow and too small. A 
more inclusive system can provide better surveillance and serve as an early 
warning mechanism," he said.

While the world grapples with the crisis, the countries most hit by the crisis 
find their growth prospects hampered, said the finance minister.

"We must not forget that there are only a handful of economies that are driving 
the world economic growth. Among them are the China and India and a few other 
countries. There are some others who have the ability to become the drivers of 
economic growth.

"So it is very important that these few countries should not suffer in the 
period during which we grapple with the economy crisis. Resources must be made 
available to developing countries, including India, so that they can continue 
to grow and try to
have economic development."
"The crisis," he said, "should not be an excuse to go into a protectionist 
cocoon. That would be the worst way to solve the crisis. We must now try to 
encourage free flow of goods and services and must continue to enhance the flow 
of capital, excepting for increasing free flow of goods, services and capital, 
there is no way in which the world will recover and get back to the growth path.

"So that is why the prime minister emphasises that this is not the time to 
adopt protectionist policies. This would require deep thought and deliberation 
and quick agreement among the leaders."

Chidambaram said that domestic regulation in the present context is a function 
"which national regulators will loath to give up. That is why regulation must 
be national. If we can agree upon common prudential and regulatory standards, 
and then ask national regulators to apply those standards, there can be some 
kind of a global oversight, where the national regulators are doing their job.

"I don't think regulation can be raised to a global regulator. That's too 
ambitious, and perhaps not possible in today's circumstances."

Answering a question on whether he was talking of a new mechanism for fund 
flows, the finance minister said: "That depends upon where the resources would 
be found. If the resources can be found and channelised through the existing 
multinational institutions, if you find resources that cannot be channelised 
through the multinational institutions then we have to find another mechanism 
through which these resources can be channelised to the developing countries."

He said that economies like India will also be impacted by the contagion that 
emanated in the United States and Europe, but such economies should not suffer 
because of the excesses of the West and more resources should be made available 
to these nations to tide over the current financial crisis.

He said that the financial crisis should not be an excuse to go into a 
protectionist cocoon. There should be freer flow of goods and services, and a 
freer flow of capital should be encouraged.

Chidambaram proposed a multi-pronged strategy to tackle the issue:

  a.. Reform in the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, Bank for 
International Settlement, Financial Stability Forum, et cetera 
  b.. Common regulatory standards for all financial institutions, especially 
those which have a global footprint 
  c.. Convergence of accounting standards across economies 
  d.. Agreement on channelization of resources through multilateral 
institutions to nations 
  e.. A better disbursing mechanism.
With the IMF unable to provide an early warning and the G7 too narrow and 
unrepresentative, the world needed to move to a new order of global monitoring 
mechanism, he added.

While dismissing the suggestion that a new Bretton Woods institution could be 
born out of the current crisis, the finance minister said that there was a need 
to improve global multilateral institutions.

"It is clear that if there had been an effective surveillance mechanism, it 
could or should have identified the huge risks that were being taken by some 
international financial entities. In the absence of this surveillance 
mechanism, these financial entities, some of which have collapsed, took 
unacceptable risk.

"That was what led to the crisis in the United States. So what we will talk 
about in
Washington is if we can agree upon such global oversight mechanism, I'm not 
sure what shape it will take. But we need to talk about it," the finance 
minister said.

He said if the World Bank would extend more funds to India, it would gladly 
accept the. He also mentioned that given the current scenario, tightening of 
purse strings by the World Bank could hit Indian states' projects.

The finance minister said that the absence of US President-elect Barack Obama 
at the G20 Summit might not impact the summit called by President George W Bush.

He said that deliberations on tackling the financial crisis facing the world 
will go well beyond January 20, 2009 (when Obama will take office) or May 22, 
2009 (when India goes to polls).

"So I don't think we are going to take an election constricted point of view. 
We have to take a medium to long term point of view, and I believe the US also 
will take that view.
"After all, President Bush and President-elect Obama are reported to have 
talked about these issues at great lengths only two days ago. So I think 
Obama's inputs will be there in whatever President Bush presents. So we will 
have to take a view that takes us well beyond those election dates. That is the 
stance that I think India will adopt." 

http://www.rediff.com/money/2008/nov/14bcrisis-global-crisis-chidambaram-5-pronged-plan.htm
When prosperity comes, do not use all of it. 








--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Kences1" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/kences1?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to