On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:51:04PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:09:32PM -0700, Glenn Barry wrote: > > 6791302 RPCSEC_GSS svc should be able to handle a misbehaving client > > > > http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gtb/6791302/webrev-O/
- usr/src/uts/common/rpc/sec_gss/svc_rpcsec_gss.c:239-240,242-245 Hmmm, rpc_msg_dup/free() and svc_clone_*() should be in a header file, no? - usr/src/uts/common/rpc/sec_gss/svc_rpcsec_gss.c:248-256,998-995 Major abstraction violation here. Shouldn't this be a private detail of svc_clone_link()? IMO: yes.
