(please reply so that boath krbdev at mit.edu and kerberos-discuss at opensolaris.org are included)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:14:56PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:01 -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:48:41PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 19:04 -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > > > > > > > > Thoughts as to whether this goal is achievable and on an approach if > > > > so? > > > > > > Would this plan affect other platforms too? > > > If so, how? > > > > If there is any impact to binaries it would something that the > > Consortium would agree is beneficial to all supported platforms. For > > example, if the Consortium agrees that providing I18N support can be > > done reasonably for all platforms then this change would become > > universal to the code otherwise the change would be restricted to > > Solaris platforms. > > Ok, but it seem that some of the feature may break compatibility. > Is there analysis on what may break ? What do you mean by "compatibility"? -- Will Fiveash Sun Microsystems Inc. http://opensolaris.org/os/project/kerberos/
