On 3 Mar 2008, at 21:48, Will Fiveash wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 09:40:25PM +0100, Mark Phalan wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Can the client print the enctype names that it requested? I
>>> understand
>>> your point below that the server isn't sending the enctype(s) that
>>> it
>>> had problems with but the client should be able to map the
>>> enctypes it
>>> requested to names.
>
> What do you think about my point above?
>
Sorry, I missed it.
Yes, the client could print out the names. I suppose the config names
(eg. "des3-cbc-sha1-kd") would be better than the human readable names
("Triple DES cbc mode with HMAC/sha1"). I'll add the relevent changes.
Cheers,
-M
