<9m1qqa$jme$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> divulged: >Windows 2000 represents non-ASCII characters as UTF-8 strings >MIT and Heimdal represent them as 8-bit ISO-Latin1. Therefore, >this will not work. you could hack the source to use utf-8 encoding (horrible as that encoding is), but you'd have to be sure to update your entire domain, and cross-domain authentication would suffer. (and, hatefully enough, the microsoft method is the better of the two. it doesn't conform with the standards (such as they are) nor the deployed world (not that they've ever cared about that), so it shouldn't have been done as it was. but it is superior. don't agree? think of a domain that encompasses hosts in germany, israel, and japan, that doesn't wish to force any one area to use the string (language) conventions of the other.) -- okay, have a sig then
Re: kerberos auth against w2k server with 8 bit chars in password
those who know me have no need of my name Thu, 23 Aug 2001 06:30:54 -0700
- kerberos auth against w2k server... Paul Haldane
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: kerberos auth against w... those who know me have no need of my name
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Nicolas Williams
- Re: kerberos auth again... Nicolas Williams
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Paul Haldane
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Douglas E. Engert
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Steve Langasek
- Re: kerberos auth against w... Nicolas Williams
- Re: kerberos auth against w... those who know me have no need of my name