>I am kinda new to kerberos and started to play with ldap / kerberos to >get a single-sign-on running for Windows and Unix/Linux-Clients. > >Right now I am unsure which kerberos implementation to choose. I've >checked the FAQ, searched groups.google - without finding pros and cons >of the MIT | Cygnus | KTH | Heimdal - implementations.
Short summary: - Cygnus seems to be effectively dead; I think that they have stopped all of their Kerberos development. Wouldn't recommend it. - KTH I _believe_ is the final V4 release from the guys in Sweden; don't think it's a good idea to start out with V4 in this day and age. That leaves MIT and Heimdal; I'm personally an MIT guy, but I know plenty of people that use Heimdal. You could try one and see if it meets your needs (maybe since you're from Germany, you might want to try Heimdal if for no other reason than European solidarity :-) ). --Ken
