On 15 Mar 2002, Donn Cave wrote: > Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Booker C. Bense"): > | On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Rechenberg, Andrew wrote: > | > | > OK, I put a .k5login file in $HOME and it works, but I don't > | > want to have to do this for 500+ users. :( Any other suggestions? > | > > | > | - You'll need to patch the src code. Look in > | > | >http://www.stanford.edu/~bbense/stanford_krb_patches/version1.2.2/lib/krb5/os/kuserok.c > | > | - I'm not sure it's the best way to do it, but that's what > | we do here. > > Best way to do what? I see that your patch makes .k5login policy > depend on existence of another file, if absent then .k5login is > required. And the comments explain why. But how would that help > in the present case? I must have missed something about the setup > there - it looked to me like he would want the normal default > behavior from krb5_kuserok(), and I don't see why he would need > .k5login. >
- Sorry, I forgot that the default was to let you in if .k5login was missing. - Booker C. Bense ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos