I disagree that it's a POS. It's lacks depth, and it's certainly not the document that you should use to administrate your KDC, but it's not a bad intro to kerberos for people who have little to no experience with it, and are approaching it mostly from a user's perspective. On the otherhand, if you WERE expecting to be a definitive reference, the blame for your disappointment should be more internal than external.
I certainly didn't find any more mistakes in it than I found in the actual MIT docs. > From: Steve Freed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yes, this is the 60 page POS that the original posting was about. > > > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, John Rudd wrote: > > > > > I don't know if this one was mentioned yet, but there's also > > > > "Kerberos: A Network Authentication System" by Brian Tung (addison > > wesley) > > > > > > It's more of a booklet than a book, and it doens't go in to deep detail, > > but it does a good job as an intro to kerberos. > > ________________________________________________ > > Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos > > > ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos