>>>>> "Ken" == Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It is also worth noting, that, while Heimdal is not thread safe >> (at least there are no guarantees), it has proven to be much >> more thread-robust than MIT. OpenLDAP page and a couple of >> users have expirienced problems with MIT and threaded OpenLDAP >> server, while Heimdal performed flawlessly. >> >> It could be that Heimdal IS thread-safe, just nobody knows for >> sure. :-) Ken> I believe that many of the problems of thread-safeness in MIT Ken> Kerberos result from the lack of any file locking in the Ken> replay cache code. It would be nice if someone having crashes with OpenLDAP would get a backtrace showing this. Certainly if the problem were well-defined we'd be happy to spend a bit of time making Open LDAP users' lives easier possibly on a relatively short time scale. --Sam ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos