I wonder why the patches have not been accepted into MIT Kerberos if MIT is looking for that functionality? Oh well.
I think "multimaster" or something of that sort is pretty much of interest to me b/c I want multiple machines to be able to service password changes. -----Original Message----- From: Sam Hartman To: Digant Kasundra Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 3/24/2004 2:03 PM Subject: Re: Multi-master KDCs Not having incremental propagation support for database changes is a problem for MIT Kerberos in some environments; it is a problem we'd like to fix. Transferring the entire database can be expensive over some network links. There are a few environments where multi-master is a requirement. But getting multi-master right is hard and so far has not been worth the necessary time for either Heimdal or MIT Kerberos. I believe that people have evaluated the incremental propagation solutions with an assumption that some day they may need to support multi-master. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
