Thanks for the information. Does MIT intend to implement the standard once it's finalized?
-Christopher -----Original Message----- From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 10:42 AM To: Nebergall, Christopher Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PKINIT Standard >>>>> "Sam" == Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> "Nebergall," == Nebergall, Christopher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sam> Briefly, there are not many open issues left. Once these are Sam> resolved the draft will presumably enter working group last Sam> call which takes two weeks. Then there will be an IETF last Sam> call which takes two weeks. Assuming no issues requiring Sam> significant work happen at either stage, the draft will be Sam> placed on the IESG agenda for their approval. The earliest Sam> this could happen is January 20, 2006. Or rather January 20, 2005. Sam> For a draft this complicated I'd expect at least some Sam> concerns raised by the IESG. Sam> So earliest possible date for approval is January 20. More Sam> likely, approval in February with some reasonable chance of Sam> much longer than that. Sam> In the grand scheme of things, this is very close to Sam> approval. I would not expect any more protocol changes Sam> unless someone finds something unexpected. Sam> --Sam, speaking only for myself Sam> ________________________________________________ Kerberos Sam> mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sam> https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos