Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hm. I think we have a problem here. Certainly MIT's krb5-config emits > -R options (on the appropriate platform), and the autoconf glue that > I've written assumes that it does. I was under the impression that gcc > (at least on Solaris) passes -R options to ld unmolested (I just tested > that, and that's true on Solaris).
gcc attempts to do the right thing with -R on platforms that support it, but may not recognize the flag on platforms that don't use -R or have some other shared library path mechanism. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
