>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jim> I meant to also add that I think it is generally considered Jim> bad form to silently fall back to a weaker security mechanism Jim> when a stronger on fails. I want to be able to configure my Jim> mail client to use GSSAPI, and if it fails, I want to be told Jim> that it failed, not fall back and perhaps successfully Jim> authenticate using CRAM-MD5, leaving me without a clue that Jim> my chosen auth method is not working. I agree having this option is nice. However I also think it is important to have a usable default behavior. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos