[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Christopher D. Clausen wrote: >> Can you simply fail-over using the same IP on both interfaces? (I >> believe there is a bonding module in Linux that can do this.) > > The point of the virt interface is so it can be moved to a different > host. If the virt interface has the same IP as the real interface, > then it couldn't be moved to another host. In other words, the > "fail-over" is to fail over to a completely separate host, not a > separate interface on the same host.
Uhh, can I ask why you are doing this? Kerberos already has a master/slave architecture. There is no need to "cluster" Kerberos servers in the manner you describe. Just setup multiple slave servers. I thought you wanted more reliable KDCs by having redundant network interfaces. <<CDC ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
