On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 04:14:21PM -0500, Jeff Blaine wrote: > Very likely. One heads down roads like these and > the default 'other' stack are the last things to > consider (for me at least).
If we shipped a default PAM configuration for every application then modifying the "other" one wouldn't be a way to shoot yourself in the foot. But then you'd have to do that much more editing of pam.conf... Nico -- ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos