[This discussion might be more appropriate for krb...@mit.edu as it pertains to MIT krb5 development, but I will answer here.]
On 04/19/2017 08:14 AM, Richard Silverman wrote: > I see that there are recent pull requests on the GitHub mirror for MIT > Kerberos (https://github.com/krb5/krb5). Do you prefer to receive bug reports > accompanied by proposed patches there, or still in RT via krb5-b...@mit.edu? github is our preferred avenue for patches, while krb5-b...@mit.edu is still our preferred avenue for big reports. Ordinarily if you have both in hand, it's fine to start with a github PR and we will create the bug ticket retroactively with the commit. But in the specific case of your recently submitted bug report (#8579), I think some careful analysis of the bug will be required before we know the appropriate design for the fix, so a PR might be premature. ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
