Andrew Cobaugh <andrew.coba...@gmail.com> writes: > Also currently using it to demonstrate how much faster MIT Kerberos is > compared to AD, even when not using workers (on modern-ish CPUs, without > workers enabled krb5kdc can do ~4000 rps. I can share more details if > folks are interested).
Ah, good, I'm glad my 100 qps number was off in the direction that I thought it would be. I didn't want to overpromise, but KDCs are *really fast*. -- Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> ________________________________________________ Kerberos mailing list Kerberos@mit.edu https://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/kerberos
