+1 for a release. However, I believe there to be a security issue with anonymous pkinit as per my recent mail, so I'd like this to be addressed in the release first.
Colm. On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Emmanuel Lécharny <elecha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le 27/07/16 à 10:54, Zheng, Kai a écrit : > > Maybe we could release this version as 1.0.0 directly? Any concern? I > don't see any. We could claim the authorization feature and remote kadmin > support as [EXPERIMENTAL]. > > > > Sorry too busy recently and don't have bandwidth on this. Hope it can > move forward anyway. > > That's really up to you ! If there were no complain with the latest RC, > then, yes, delivering a 1.0 would totally make sense. > > FTR, in the past, we had a convoluted versionning pattern at Directory > for projects, with numerous milestones. This was plain stupid. I really > like the way Chrome and Firefox are released those days, with a quick > incremental version : each new features added deserve a separate > version, with some potential minor versions for urgent bug fixes. > > But this is something you have to discuss, my friends ;-) > -- Colm O hEigeartaigh Talend Community Coder http://coders.talend.com
