> Should this be intelligent enough to close any parantheses or similar, > in case there are any open after truncating? > [snip] > This is probably not very urgent, though. Might be suitable for 2.18?
Quite right. I had this in mind. The user does see the truncated query on the result page so it should be obvious was went wrong and for the user to correct. It can be re-addressed in 2.18 if the need comes. ok? ~mck -- "The future influences the present just as much as the past." Friedrich Nietzsche | semb.wever.org | sesat.no | sesam.no |
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Kernel-development mailing list [email protected] http://sesat.no/mailman/listinfo/kernel-development
