** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** No longer affects: makedumpfile (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo (cascardo)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to makedumpfile in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1736954

Title:
  ppc64el: Do not call ibm,os-term on panic

Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  When panic_timeout is set, the user would expect that the system would
  reboot after some timeout after a panic.

  However, on powerpc architecture, a panic notifier may not ever return
  and even shutdown the system. The main example that impacts platforms
  we support is pseries calling RTAS ibm,os-term.

  That panic notifier and calling RTAS ibm,os-term is useful for fadump,
  so this should not be impacted.

  The Linux code has changed back and forth on considering the
  panic_timeout setting and checking whether ibm,extended-os-term was
  available. Unfortunately, recent changes on qemu led to the guest
  being shut down when calling ibm,os-term even when ibm,extended-os-
  term was available.

  Luckily, upstream Linux already has the change that does not call ibm
  ,os-term on panic, but only during fadump. So, we can use that commit
  for fixing this. Changing qemu itself is harder as: 1) qemu community
  already decided some qemu settings should override PAPR; 2) updating
  deployed hypervisor is harder than updating our guest kernels.

  Cascardo.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1736954/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to