Public bug reported: BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836971
[Impact] On machines with extremely high CPU usage, parent task groups which have a large number of children can make the for loop in sched_cfs_period_timer() run until the watchdog fires when the cfs_period_us setting is too short. In this particular case, it is unlikely that the call to hrtimer_forward_now() will return 0, meaning the for loop is never left, and tasks are never rescheduled. The large number of children makes do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take longer than the period, which impacts calls to hrtimer_forward_now(). The kernel will produce this call trace: CPU: 51 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/51 Tainted: P OELK 4.15.0-50-generic #54-Ubuntu Call Trace: <IRQ> ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 walk_tg_tree_from+0x61/0xd0 ? task_rq_unlock+0x30/0x30 unthrottle_cfs_rq+0xcb/0x1a0 distribute_cfs_runtime+0xd7/0x100 sched_cfs_period_timer+0xd9/0x1a0 ? sched_cfs_slack_timer+0xe0/0xe0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xdf/0x230 hrtimer_interrupt+0xa0/0x1d0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x130 apic_timer_interrupt+0x84/0x90 </IRQ> This has been hit in production in a particularly highly utilised hadoop cluster which is powering an analytics platform. About 30% of the cluster experiences this issue every week, and the machines need a manual reboot to get back online. [Fix] This was fixed in 5.1 upstream with the below commit: commit 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 Author: Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 19 09:00:05 2019 -0400 subject: sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup This commit adds a check to see if the loop has run too many times, and if it has, scales up the period and quota, so the timer can complete before the next period expires, which enables the task to be rescheduled normally. Note, 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 was included in upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10. Please cherry pick 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 to all bionic kernels. [Testcase] Kind of hard to reproduce, so this was tested on a production hadoop cluster with extremely high CPU load. I built a test kernel, which is available here: https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf232784-test For unpatched kernels, expect the machine to lockup and print the call trace in the impact section. For patched kernels, if the machine hits the condition, it will print a warning to the kernel log with the new period and quota which has been used: Example from the same hadoop cluster with a machine running the test kernel: % uname -a 4.15.0-50-generic #54+hf232784v20190626b1-Ubuntu % sudo grep cfs /var/log/kern.log.* cfs_period_timer[cpu40]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 22430, cfs_quota_us = 1148437) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 25759, cfs_quota_us = 1318908) cfs_period_timer[cpu68]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 29583, cfs_quota_us = 1514684) cfs_period_timer[cpu49]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 33974, cfs_quota_us = 1739519) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 39017, cfs_quota_us = 1997729) cfs_period_timer[cpu10]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 44809, cfs_quota_us = 2294267) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 51460, cfs_quota_us = 2634823) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 59099, cfs_quota_us = 3025929) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) [Regression Potential] This patch was accepted into upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10, and is thus treated as stable and trusted by the community. Xenial received this patch in 4.4.0-150.176, as per LP #1828420 Disco will receive this patch in the next version, as per LP #1830922 Eoan already has the patch, being based on 5.2. While this does effect a core part of the kernel, the scheduler, the patch has been extensively tested, and it has been proven in production environments, so the overall risk is low. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Medium Assignee: Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) Status: In Progress ** Tags: sts ** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: sts ** Description changed: - BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/ + BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836971 [Impact] - On machines with extremely high CPU usage, parent task groups which have a large - number of children can make the for loop in sched_cfs_period_timer() run until - the watchdog fires when the cfs_period_us setting is too short. + On machines with extremely high CPU usage, parent task groups which have + a large number of children can make the for loop in + sched_cfs_period_timer() run until the watchdog fires when the + cfs_period_us setting is too short. - In this particular case, it is unlikely that the call to hrtimer_forward_now() - will return 0, meaning the for loop is never left, and tasks are never - rescheduled. + In this particular case, it is unlikely that the call to + hrtimer_forward_now() will return 0, meaning the for loop is never left, + and tasks are never rescheduled. - The large number of children makes do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take longer than - the period, which impacts calls to hrtimer_forward_now(). + The large number of children makes do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take + longer than the period, which impacts calls to hrtimer_forward_now(). The kernel will produce this call trace: CPU: 51 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/51 Tainted: P OELK 4.15.0-50-generic #54-Ubuntu Call Trace: <IRQ> ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 walk_tg_tree_from+0x61/0xd0 ? task_rq_unlock+0x30/0x30 unthrottle_cfs_rq+0xcb/0x1a0 distribute_cfs_runtime+0xd7/0x100 sched_cfs_period_timer+0xd9/0x1a0 ? sched_cfs_slack_timer+0xe0/0xe0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xdf/0x230 hrtimer_interrupt+0xa0/0x1d0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x130 apic_timer_interrupt+0x84/0x90 - </IRQ> + </IRQ> - This has been hit in production in a particularly highly utilised hadoop cluster - which is powering an analytics platform. About 30% of the cluster experiences - this issue every week, and the machines need a manual reboot to get back online. + This has been hit in production in a particularly highly utilised hadoop + cluster which is powering an analytics platform. About 30% of the + cluster experiences this issue every week, and the machines need a + manual reboot to get back online. [Fix] This was fixed in 5.1 upstream with the below commit: commit 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 Author: Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 19 09:00:05 2019 -0400 - subject: sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup + subject: sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup This commit adds a check to see if the loop has run too many times, and if it has, scales up the period and quota, so the timer can complete before the next period expires, which enables the task to be rescheduled normally. Note, 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 was included in upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10. Please cherry pick 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 to all bionic kernels. [Testcase] Kind of hard to reproduce, so this was tested on a production hadoop cluster with extremely high CPU load. I built a test kernel, which is available here: https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf232784-test - For unpatched kernels, expect the machine to lockup and print the call trace in - the impact section. + For unpatched kernels, expect the machine to lockup and print the call + trace in the impact section. - For patched kernels, if the machine hits the condition, it will print a warning - to the kernel log with the new period and quota which has been used: + For patched kernels, if the machine hits the condition, it will print a + warning to the kernel log with the new period and quota which has been + used: Example from the same hadoop cluster with a machine running the test kernel: % uname -a - 4.15.0-50-generic #54+hf232784v20190626b1-Ubuntu + 4.15.0-50-generic #54+hf232784v20190626b1-Ubuntu % sudo grep cfs /var/log/kern.log.* cfs_period_timer[cpu40]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 22430, cfs_quota_us = 1148437) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 25759, cfs_quota_us = 1318908) cfs_period_timer[cpu68]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 29583, cfs_quota_us = 1514684) cfs_period_timer[cpu49]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 33974, cfs_quota_us = 1739519) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 39017, cfs_quota_us = 1997729) cfs_period_timer[cpu10]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 44809, cfs_quota_us = 2294267) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 51460, cfs_quota_us = 2634823) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 59099, cfs_quota_us = 3025929) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) [Regression Potential] - This patch was accepted into upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, + This patch was accepted into upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10, and is thus treated as stable and trusted by the community. Xenial received this patch in 4.4.0-150.176, as per LP #1828420 Disco will receive this patch in the next version, as per LP #1830922 Eoan already has the patch, being based on 5.2. - While this does effect a core part of the kernel, the scheduler, the patch has - been extensively tested, and it has been proven in production environments, - so the overall risk is low. + While this does effect a core part of the kernel, the scheduler, the + patch has been extensively tested, and it has been proven in production + environments, so the overall risk is low. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthew Ruffell (mruffell) ** Description changed: BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836971 [Impact] On machines with extremely high CPU usage, parent task groups which have a large number of children can make the for loop in sched_cfs_period_timer() run until the watchdog fires when the cfs_period_us setting is too short. In this particular case, it is unlikely that the call to hrtimer_forward_now() will return 0, meaning the for loop is never left, and tasks are never rescheduled. The large number of children makes do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take longer than the period, which impacts calls to hrtimer_forward_now(). The kernel will produce this call trace: CPU: 51 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/51 Tainted: P OELK 4.15.0-50-generic #54-Ubuntu Call Trace: <IRQ> ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 walk_tg_tree_from+0x61/0xd0 ? task_rq_unlock+0x30/0x30 unthrottle_cfs_rq+0xcb/0x1a0 distribute_cfs_runtime+0xd7/0x100 sched_cfs_period_timer+0xd9/0x1a0 ? sched_cfs_slack_timer+0xe0/0xe0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xdf/0x230 hrtimer_interrupt+0xa0/0x1d0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x130 apic_timer_interrupt+0x84/0x90 </IRQ> This has been hit in production in a particularly highly utilised hadoop cluster which is powering an analytics platform. About 30% of the cluster experiences this issue every week, and the machines need a manual reboot to get back online. [Fix] This was fixed in 5.1 upstream with the below commit: commit 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 Author: Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 19 09:00:05 2019 -0400 subject: sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup This commit adds a check to see if the loop has run too many times, and if it has, scales up the period and quota, so the timer can complete before the next period expires, which enables the task to be rescheduled normally. - Note, 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 was included in upstream stable - versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10. + Note, 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 was included in upstream + stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10. Please cherry pick 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 to all bionic kernels. [Testcase] Kind of hard to reproduce, so this was tested on a production hadoop cluster with extremely high CPU load. I built a test kernel, which is available here: https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf232784-test For unpatched kernels, expect the machine to lockup and print the call trace in the impact section. For patched kernels, if the machine hits the condition, it will print a warning to the kernel log with the new period and quota which has been used: Example from the same hadoop cluster with a machine running the test kernel: % uname -a 4.15.0-50-generic #54+hf232784v20190626b1-Ubuntu % sudo grep cfs /var/log/kern.log.* cfs_period_timer[cpu40]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 22430, cfs_quota_us = 1148437) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 25759, cfs_quota_us = 1318908) cfs_period_timer[cpu68]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 29583, cfs_quota_us = 1514684) cfs_period_timer[cpu49]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 33974, cfs_quota_us = 1739519) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 39017, cfs_quota_us = 1997729) cfs_period_timer[cpu10]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 44809, cfs_quota_us = 2294267) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 51460, cfs_quota_us = 2634823) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 59099, cfs_quota_us = 3025929) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) [Regression Potential] This patch was accepted into upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10, and is thus treated as stable and trusted by the community. Xenial received this patch in 4.4.0-150.176, as per LP #1828420 Disco will receive this patch in the next version, as per LP #1830922 Eoan already has the patch, being based on 5.2. While this does effect a core part of the kernel, the scheduler, the patch has been extensively tested, and it has been proven in production environments, so the overall risk is low. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836971 Title: sched: Prevent CPU lockups when task groups take longer than the period Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Status in linux source package in Bionic: In Progress Bug description: BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836971 [Impact] On machines with extremely high CPU usage, parent task groups which have a large number of children can make the for loop in sched_cfs_period_timer() run until the watchdog fires when the cfs_period_us setting is too short. In this particular case, it is unlikely that the call to hrtimer_forward_now() will return 0, meaning the for loop is never left, and tasks are never rescheduled. The large number of children makes do_sched_cfs_period_timer() take longer than the period, which impacts calls to hrtimer_forward_now(). The kernel will produce this call trace: CPU: 51 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/51 Tainted: P OELK 4.15.0-50-generic #54-Ubuntu Call Trace: <IRQ> ? sched_clock+0x9/0x10 walk_tg_tree_from+0x61/0xd0 ? task_rq_unlock+0x30/0x30 unthrottle_cfs_rq+0xcb/0x1a0 distribute_cfs_runtime+0xd7/0x100 sched_cfs_period_timer+0xd9/0x1a0 ? sched_cfs_slack_timer+0xe0/0xe0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0xdf/0x230 hrtimer_interrupt+0xa0/0x1d0 smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x130 apic_timer_interrupt+0x84/0x90 </IRQ> This has been hit in production in a particularly highly utilised hadoop cluster which is powering an analytics platform. About 30% of the cluster experiences this issue every week, and the machines need a manual reboot to get back online. [Fix] This was fixed in 5.1 upstream with the below commit: commit 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 Author: Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> Date: Tue Mar 19 09:00:05 2019 -0400 subject: sched/fair: Limit sched_cfs_period_timer() loop to avoid hard lockup This commit adds a check to see if the loop has run too many times, and if it has, scales up the period and quota, so the timer can complete before the next period expires, which enables the task to be rescheduled normally. Note, 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 was included in upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10. Please cherry pick 2e8e19226398db8265a8e675fcc0118b9e80c9e8 to all bionic kernels. [Testcase] Kind of hard to reproduce, so this was tested on a production hadoop cluster with extremely high CPU load. I built a test kernel, which is available here: https://launchpad.net/~mruffell/+archive/ubuntu/sf232784-test For unpatched kernels, expect the machine to lockup and print the call trace in the impact section. For patched kernels, if the machine hits the condition, it will print a warning to the kernel log with the new period and quota which has been used: Example from the same hadoop cluster with a machine running the test kernel: % uname -a 4.15.0-50-generic #54+hf232784v20190626b1-Ubuntu % sudo grep cfs /var/log/kern.log.* cfs_period_timer[cpu40]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 22430, cfs_quota_us = 1148437) cfs_period_timer[cpu48]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 25759, cfs_quota_us = 1318908) cfs_period_timer[cpu68]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 29583, cfs_quota_us = 1514684) cfs_period_timer[cpu49]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 33974, cfs_quota_us = 1739519) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 39017, cfs_quota_us = 1997729) cfs_period_timer[cpu10]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 44809, cfs_quota_us = 2294267) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 51460, cfs_quota_us = 2634823) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 59099, cfs_quota_us = 3025929) cfs_period_timer[cpu3]: period too short, scaling up (new cfs_period_us 67872, cfs_quota_us = 3475091) [Regression Potential] This patch was accepted into upstream stable versions 4.4.179, 4.9.171, 4.14.114, 4.19.37, 5.0.10, and is thus treated as stable and trusted by the community. Xenial received this patch in 4.4.0-150.176, as per LP #1828420 Disco will receive this patch in the next version, as per LP #1830922 Eoan already has the patch, being based on 5.2. While this does effect a core part of the kernel, the scheduler, the patch has been extensively tested, and it has been proven in production environments, so the overall risk is low. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836971/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
