** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Disco)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851709
Title:
Ubuntu-5.0.0-33.35 introduces KVM regression with old Intel CPUs and
Linux guests
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
New
Status in linux source package in Disco:
New
Bug description:
Mostly the same info as on a related kernel.org bugzilla entr[0].
[0]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205441
We got issues reported with old Intel CPUs and Linux guest run with
QEMU/KVM after a recent kernel update which is based on
Ubuntu-5.0.0-33.35.
I bisected this here, with following result:
git bisect log
# bad: [3b931173c97b0d73f80ea55b72bb2966a246167f] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-5.0.0-33.35
# good: [5d5a6b36e94909962297fae609bff487de3cc43a] UBUNTU: Ubuntu-5.0.0-30.32
git bisect start '3b931173c97b0d73f80ea55b72bb2966a246167f'
'5d5a6b36e94909962297fae609bff487de3cc43a'
# good: [7b4f844b33969ab166800f8936beef153fab736e] net/ibmvnic: free reset
work
of removed device from queue
git bisect good 7b4f844b33969ab166800f8936beef153fab736e
# bad: [6c1fc88702a4f33886b44ce5b6f374893b95e369] arm64: tlb: Ensure we
execute
an ISB following walk cache invalidation
git bisect bad 6c1fc88702a4f33886b44ce5b6f374893b95e369
# good: [e627a027b54eccc95f9e374d69aead7f1498877b] loop: Add
LOOP_SET_DIRECT_IO
to compat ioctl
git bisect good e627a027b54eccc95f9e374d69aead7f1498877b
# good: [29919eff6333bc67ec580b454afdd8b49883df2f] libata/ahci: Drop PCS quirk
for Denverton and beyond
git bisect good 29919eff6333bc67ec580b454afdd8b49883df2f
# good: [cb44193f94af73928f8df049ffbb6b4a0be136ae] PM / devfreq: passive: fix
compiler warning
git bisect good cb44193f94af73928f8df049ffbb6b4a0be136ae
# good: [b1d479b27b26966aea931094b31864979d7f8102] scsi: implement .cleanup_rq
callback
git bisect good b1d479b27b26966aea931094b31864979d7f8102
# bad: [ec15813844b05d8cbd4352c65a20e57d16f9f936] media: sn9c20x: Add MSI
MS-1039 laptop to flip_dmi_table
git bisect bad ec15813844b05d8cbd4352c65a20e57d16f9f936
# good: [e83601f51a90d9739ced9ff42b6f202f8f802c72] parisc: Disable HP HSC-PCI
Cards to prevent kernel crash
git bisect good e83601f51a90d9739ced9ff42b6f202f8f802c72
# good: [6d393bdf3b3f4b629070329488d3c6a3e142602b] KVM: x86: set
ctxt->have_exception in x86_decode_insn()
git bisect good 6d393bdf3b3f4b629070329488d3c6a3e142602b
# bad: [208007519a7385a57b0c0a3c180142a521594876] KVM: x86: Manually calculate
reserved bits when loading PDPTRS
git bisect bad 208007519a7385a57b0c0a3c180142a521594876
# first bad commit: [208007519a7385a57b0c0a3c180142a521594876] KVM: x86:
Manually calculate reserved bits when loading PDPTRS
Which is:
KVM: x86: Manually calculate reserved bits when loading PDPTRS
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848367
commit 16cfacc8085782dab8e365979356ce1ca87fd6cc upstream.
Manually generate the PDPTR reserved bit mask when explicitly loading
PDPTRs. The reserved bits that are being tracked by the MMU reflect the
current paging mode, which is unlikely to be PAE paging in the vast
majority of flows that use load_pdptrs(), e.g. CR0 and CR4 emulation,
__set_sregs(), etc... This can cause KVM to incorrectly signal a bad
PDPTR, or more likely, miss a reserved bit check and subsequently fail
a VM-Enter due to a bad VMCS.GUEST_PDPTR.
Add a one off helper to generate the reserved bits instead of sharing
code across the MMU's calculations and the PDPTR emulation. The PDPTR
reserved bits are basically set in stone, and pushing a helper into
the MMU's calculation adds unnecessary complexity without improving
readability.
Oppurtunistically fix/update the comment for load_pdptrs().
Note, the buggy commit also introduced a deliberate functional change,
"Also remove bit 5-6 from rsvd_bits_mask per latest SDM.", which was
effectively (and correctly) reverted by commit cd9ae5fe47df ("KVM: x86:
Fix page-tables reserved bits"). A bit of SDM archaeology shows that
the SDM from late 2008 had a bug (likely a copy+paste error) where it
listed bits 6:5 as AVL and A for PDPTEs used for 4k entries but reserved
for 2mb entries. I.e. the SDM contradicted itself, and bits 6:5 are and
always have been reserved.
Fixes: 20c466b56168d ("KVM: Use rsvd_bits_mask in load_pdptrs()")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.a...@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Doug Reiland <doug.reil...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopher...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <ka...@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.so...@canonical.com>
This one is also included in the 4.19.81 (or more correctly, it's there since
v4.19.77) with commit 496cf984a60edb5534118a596613cc9971e406e8 [0] or
upstream commit 16cfacc8085782dab8e365979356ce1ca87fd6cc [1].
[0]:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git/commit/?h=v4.19.82&id=496cf984a60edb5534118a596613cc9971e406e8
[1]:
https://git.kernel.org/torvalds/c/16cfacc8085782dab8e365979356ce1ca87fd6cc
Funny thing is: I cannot reproduce this with a 5.3.7 (Eoan) kernel, which
_also_
includes above commit. So possible another patch is missing in the backport,
did not find anything obvious though...
So summary for reproducer:
* dust of an host with old Intel CPU, e.g.: Intel Core2Duo CPU E8500 @3.16GHz
(something else westmer, conroe or the like should work too, or if it's
released
over 10 years ago.
* Install a Linux Distro or just boot the installer of that in a VM, I used
Debian 9,
as our users had issues with that but *not* with an ubuntu 19.10 VM.
* see how it boot loops once a stable-kernel with above[0] backported
is used on the host
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1851709/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
