Only "linux-5.4" task was changed to invalid before it was removed.
The "linux" task was and still is confirmed.

Launchpad bug tracker supports tracking multiple states across multiple
packages simultaniously. You can always see the correct status of the
bug, for each task, at the top of the page. It is currently confirmed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863116

Title:
  debian/rules editconfigs does not work on s390x to change s390x only
  configs

Status in Ubuntu on IBM z Systems:
  Confirmed
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  On s390x

  pull-lp-source linux-5.4
  cd linux-*
  fakeroot ./debian/rules clean
  ./debian/rules editconfig
  dh_testdir;
  /bin/bash -e debian/scripts/misc/kernelconfig editconfigs
  Do you want to edit config: amd64/config.flavour.generic? [Y/n] n
  ...
  scripts/Kconfig.include:35: compiler 'x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc' not found
  make[3]: *** [../scripts/kconfig/Makefile:73: syncconfig] Error 1
  make[2]: *** [/home/ubuntu/linux-5.4-5.4.0/Makefile:594: syncconfig] Error 2
  make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/linux-5.4-5.4.0/build'
  make[1]: *** [Makefile:179: sub-make] Error 2
  make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/ubuntu/linux-5.4-5.4.0'
  make: *** [debian/rules.d/1-maintainer.mk:44: editconfigs] Error 2

  And indeed i do not have x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc crosscompiler available
  to build on s390x for amd64, and also I don't want to touch amd64
  configs. Only s390x ones.

  As a user, I should be able to rebuild ports architecture kernel with
  tweaked config for testing, self-hosted without cross-compilers.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1863116/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to