** Tags added: ubuntu-kernel-selftests
** Description changed:
== SRU Justification ==
- The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output
example:
- raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
- ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
+ The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes.
+ Here is an output example:
+ raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
+ ./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
- The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test
execution output.
+ The first line is the test case description, and the second is the
+ test execution output.
+
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
- The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to
check the source code to know this fact.
+ The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will
+ have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
- * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
+ * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
+ psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
+ == Test ==
+ Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description
+ will be changed as expected.
+
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Description changed:
== SRU Justification ==
- The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes.
- Here is an output example:
+ The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output
example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
- The first line is the test case description, and the second is the
- test execution output.
-
+ The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test
execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
- The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will
- have to check the source code to know this fact.
+ The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to
check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
- * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
- psock_snd.sh
+ * 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
- == Test ==
- Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description
- will be changed as expected.
+ This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only.
** Description changed:
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output
example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test
execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to
check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
- This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
+ This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900088
Title:
Improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in kselftests/net/psock_snd
Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
New
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Status in linux source package in Focal:
New
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
Incomplete
Bug description:
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output
example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test
execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to
check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1900088/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
