** Also affects: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
       Status: New

** Changed in: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Focal)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu Focal)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Shravan Kumar Ramani (sramani)

** Changed in: linux-bluefield (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-bluefield in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948434

Title:
  Check if secure boot is enabled with development keys

Status in linux-bluefield package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux-bluefield source package in Focal:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  SRU Justification:

  [Impact]
  Currently, there is no indication from mlx-bootctl when the user reads the 
lifecycle_state sysfs as to whether secure boot is enabled with development 
keys or production keys. In order to make this clear to the user, add a check 
in the driver.

  [Fix]
  Check the secure boot development mode status bit. If secure boot is enabled 
with the development key, then print it to the output buffer when 
lifecycle_state_show() is invoked.

  [Test Case]
  On a system in secure state, if it has been programmed with development keys, 
then reading the lifecycle_state sysfs entry in the mlx-bootctl driver should 
print a message that indicates the same.
  Similarly, a secure system which has been programmed with production keys 
must print the appropriate message when the lifecycle_state sysfs is read.

  [Regression Potential]
  Can be considered minimum.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-bluefield/+bug/1948434/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to