Override component to main firmware-sof 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic: restricted/misc -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic amd64: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic arm64: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic armhf: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic i386: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic ppc64el: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic riscv64: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main firmware-sof-signed 2.1.1-1ubuntu1 in kinetic s390x: restricted/kernel/optional/100% -> main 8 publications overridden.
** Changed in: firmware-sof (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to firmware-sof in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1738272 Title: microcode packages, like firmware packages, should be in main Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in intel-microcode package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in iucode-tool package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: The MIR for intel-microcode and iucode-tool in LP: #1388889 requested that these packages be shipped in restricted. The iucode-tool package is free software, and is shipped in restricted only because of the circular recommends with intel-microcode. The intel-microcode package contains non-free software (free redistribution, but no source code). However, this code is not part of the OS; it runs /under/ the OS on the CPU, and is analogous to linux-firmware, which we do include in main. The question of suitability for restricted vs. main in Ubuntu was not examined as part of the previous MIR, and the security team signed off on it for "restricted or main as appropriate"; so I think the decision to put it in restricted was not based on a thorough examination of the facts by an archive admin, and does not represent a precedent that needs to be examined further. I believe that these two packages should be promoted to main for consistency. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/1738272/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp