* Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, it was my confusion -- I later realized that your data
> above meant that the force-quiescent-state code path was not
> being heavily exercised. So no need for this trace!
Do you have any theory for why RCU was activated every 100-200
microseconds, resulting in 20% ksoftirqd CPU use - and why the
problem went away with classic-rcu?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-testers" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
